A Board of Directors Meeting was held on April 29, 2014 to consider ending the occupancy and membership rights of a member - in other words 'eviction'.
Here is the decision:
1. Letter dated May 1, 2014 - "The Board of Directors have not decided to end your occupancy rights in the above unit on May 11, 2014 and have decided to end your membership in the co-operative on that date."
2. Schedule E - Eviction Decision - "4. The occupancy rights and the membership in the Co-operative of the members in the above unit are ended on May 11, 2014."
3. Schedule E - Further Decision - "A new Notice to Appear will be issued for Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. where the Board of Directors will consider ending the membership and occupancy rights of the above member on Sunday, May 25, 2014.
Tacked on to Schedule E under the heading Behaviour is a new charge:
You owe $526. of housing charge arrears to the Co-op as of March 31, 1014.
There is no such fictitious charge in the new Notice to Appear.
Instead, on Friday, May 2, 2014, the co-op's maintenance man, - at co-op expense - installed strategically placed front and rear security cameras on the unit next to the potential evictee's unit. The Property Manager forfeited her day off to oversee this operation and can now watch my neighbour and all of us 24 hrs. a day on her smart phone.
The completely incomprehensible eviction decisions and the security cameras are intimidation tactics - poisonous game playing at its worst.
Would it be rhetorical to ask if your BOD and PM have a clue of what they're doing?
ReplyDeleteHas the Member bothered calling the police or others to see if Co-op had legal authority to put such surveillance cameras on the unit w/o permission?
Why do I get feeling that reasons provided by Co-Op are as bogus as is day is long?
So many questions, so few answers.